Power Up Your Brain
Power Up Your Brain
by David Perlmutter, MD, FACN, ABIHM &
Albert Villoldo, Ph.D
Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten
Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten
by David Perlmutter, MD, FACN, ABIHM
The Better Brain Book


by David Perlmutter, MD, FACN, ABIHM
Read Dr. Perlmutter's
articles at

Sleep Disorders Can Impair Children’s IQs As Much As Lead Exposure

November 13th, 2007

From ScienceDaily.com

Three decades ago, medical investigators began sounding the alarm about how lead exposure causes IQ deficits in children. Today, researchers at the University of Virginia Health System say children with sleep disorders can face similar risks of intellectual impairment.

UVa researchers have been studying sleep disturbances in children with enlarged tonsils and adenoids for the past seven years. In a recent study, they discovered that youngsters who snore nightly scored significantly lower on vocabulary tests than those who snore less often.

“Vocabulary scores are known to be the best single predictor of a child’s IQ and the strongest predictor of academic success,” explains Dr. Paul M. Suratt, a pulmonologist who directs the UVa Sleep Laboratory.

According to Dr. Suratt, the vocabulary differences associated with nightly snoring are equivalent to the IQ dissimilarities attributed to lead exposure. “Studies show that, even at nontoxic levels, lead exposure can reduce a child’s IQ by more than seven points,” he notes.

Sleep disorders can be intellectually and behaviorally detrimental to children because they interrupt the deep sleep patterns needed for healthy development. At night, children with sleep disorders can be observed snoring, snorting, gasping, tossing and turning. During the day, these children can be irritable, hyperactive and unable to concentrate.

A key goal of the UVa researchers is to predict which children with sleep disorders are most likely to suffer cognitive impairment or develop behavior problems. “It’s more difficult than you would think,” Dr. Suratt explains. “Children with sleep disordered breathing may have cognitive impairment even if they don’t completely stop breathing, even if their oxygen levels don’t fall and even if they don’t totally wake up.”

In a series of studies involving six to twelve-year-olds, researchers have been piecing together a list of risk indicators. So far, snoring frequency combined with sleep lab results have proven to be the most reliable predictors of intellectual impairment and behavioral problems. Sleep duration and race appear to be important risk factors, too.

“One of our most recent studies found that kids who snore nightly and spend less time in bed score significantly lower on cognitive tests than children who snore less frequently and spend longer times bed,” Dr. Suratt explains. “We’ve also found that obstructive sleep disordered breathing (OSBD) occurs more often in African American children and, therefore, places them at greater risk of cognitive impairment.”

As part of their quest to accurately identify at-risk children, UVa researchers are now testing a device that records breathing sounds during sleep at home. When used in the lab, this method has proven more sensitive than existing equipment in detecting sleep apnea in children.

“We’re getting closer to the day when we can quickly establish risk profiles and effective treatment plans for children with sleep disorders. Our goal is to minimize the cognitive and behavioral problems that often develop,” says Dr. Suratt

Child TV viewing linked to behavior issues

October 16th, 2007

From ScienceDaily

Daily television viewing for two or more hours in early childhood has been linked to behavioral problems and poor social skills, a U.S. study found.

A study of children ages 2.5 to 5.5 years, conducted by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, found that the impact of TV viewing on a child’s behavior and social skills varied by the age at which the viewing occurred, but heavy television viewing that decreased over time was not associated with behavior or social problems.

Lead author Kamila Mistry, a doctoral candidate at The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School, analyzed data for 2,707 children collected from the Healthy Steps for Young Children national evaluation. Parents were surveyed about their child’s television viewing habits and behavior at 2.5 and at 5.5 years of age.

The study, published in the journal Pediatrics, found that having a television in the child’s bedroom at 5.5 years of age was associated with behavioral problems, poor social skills and poor sleep. Forty-one percent of the children in the study had a television in their bedroom.

Dr. Perlmutter’s comment:

Nice to see validation of our earlier publication in Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten

Common Pediatric Anesthesia Drugs Cause Brain Damage and Learning and Memory Problems in Infant Rats

August 1st, 2007

From Washington University

A team of researchers from the University of Virginia Health System and Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has found that drugs commonly used to anesthetize children can cause brain damage and long-term learning and memory disturbances in infant rats. The researchers report their findings in the Feb. 1 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience.

We frequently perform surgical procedures on children, including premature infants, and those procedures have become increasingly more complex and take longer to perform, says the studys lead author Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic, M.D., associate professor of anesthesiology at the University of Virginia Health System. That means many pediatric patients are being exposed to anesthetic drugs more frequently and for longer periods of time. Our results would suggest that might be problematic.

Previously, Jevtovic-Todorovic was at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, where the rest of the research team is located. The investigators anesthetized 7-day-old rats with a combination of three drugs

midazolam, nitrous oxide and isoflurane

commonly used in pediatric surgery.

As the animals recovered from the anesthesia, the researchers divided them into three groups: One group was sacrificed the next day and their brains examined, a second group grew to be about a month old and a third group grew into adulthood. The latter two groups were tested for effects of anesthesia on learning and memory. Members of the research team also recorded electrical activity in the hippocampus, a brain structure known to be important in learning and memory.

These infant rats were anesthetized during the brain growth spurt period called synaptogenesis, which lasts for the first few weeks of life in rats, but in humans it extends from the third trimester of pregnancy until about age 3, says senior investigator John W. Olney, M.D., the John P. Feighner Professor of Neuropsychopharmacology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. During this period, nerve cells in the brain make connections with one another and form large networks. But if something interferes with that process, the cells are programmed to kill themselves.

In this study, the team found moderately severe cell death had occurred in several brain regions in every brain examined. This included brain regions involved in learning and memory such as hippocampus.

In addition, the rats exposed to anesthesia in infancy had significant learning and memory deficits, both at 1 month of age and in adulthood. Rats were tested in several kinds of mazes that behavioral scientists commonly use to evaluate learning and memory. In all of these tests, rats that had been anesthetized in infancy were significantly worse than those that had not been given the standard anesthesia drug combination.

The researchers also examined brain slices from the hippocampus of month-old rats. They ran electrical currents through those slices to induce a process known as long-term potentiation (LTP), which is thought to occur during learning and memory formation. Brain slices from rats who had been anesthetized with the three drug cocktail had far less LTP activity than normal.

In each part of this study, we found essentially what we expected, Jevtovic-Todorovic says. Once we had confirmed cell death, we would have expected behavioral deficits, and we found those as the rats grew into adulthood. In the electrophysiological experiments, we also found evidence of disturbances in the neural circuits of the hippocampus, the brain region which, through those circuits, plays an important role in learning and memory.

The team also found that the rats appeared to behave normally in most other ways, and there were no outward signs of brain damage.

Thats important because if similar brain damage had occurred in a human infant, it appears there would not be any overt signs that would alert you to it, Olney says.

This study fits together with a line of research that has repeatedly identified a relationship between certain classes of drugs that inhibit nerve cell activity and damage to the developing brain. Anesthetic drugs work in one of two ways, both of which inhibit nerve cell activity: Either they inhibit excitatory neurotransmission in the brain or they enhance inhibitory neurotransmission.

The excitatory system that stimulates nerve cells is what scientists call the NMDA glutamate transmitter system. In 1998, Jevtovic-Todorovic discovered that the drug nitrous oxide, or laughing gas, work by inhibiting the NMDA glutamate system. Another anesthetic drug known as Ketamine, also works by inhibiting the NMDA glutamate system.

Other anesthetic drugs work by enhancing the inhibitory activity of GABA (Gamma Amino Butyric Acid). GABA is the primary inhibitory transmitter in the brain.

In related research, Olney and colleagues in Germany demonstrated that when the developing brain is exposed to drugs that block NMDA glutamate activity, nerve cells in the brain commit suicide. They also found that drugs that enhance GABA activity can cause nerve cells in the developing brain to self-destruct.

The above findings prompted them to study alcohol, which is known to block NMDA glutamate activity and also to enhance GABA activity. They found that alcohol powerfully triggers nerve cell suicide in the developing brain, providing a likely explanation for the learning and memory disturbances associated with the human fetal alcohol syndrome. More recently, Olney and colleagues demonstrated that sodium channel blocking drugs used in pediatric medicine to manage epilepsy also cause nerve cell suicide in the infant rat brain.

In all of these studies, we have found that drugs that enhance GABA inhibition or that inhibit glutamate excitation can trigger massive cell suicide in the developing brain, Olney says. If you put nerve cells to sleep when they are supposed to be making connections, it interferes with their timing, and nerve cells are programmed to kill themselves if they dont make their connections on time.

Part of the reason cells are programmed to self-destruct is that there is redundancy built into the system. An infant is born with an excess number of nerve cells, and some cell death is normal in the developing brain. But Olneys team has found that when drugs interfere with the cell and put it to sleep when it is trying to make connections, the suicide rate rises to abnormally high proportions.

Previous studies by these researchers have helped explain how abuse of certain drugs, including alcohol, can damage the developing brain. But in the present study by Jevtovic-Todorovic and colleagues, the investigators found that drugs used commonly in pediatric anesthesia also can damage the developing brain.

According to Olney, this is a serious dilemma because anesthesia is required to do surgery, and surgery is the only option for some infants with life-threatening problems.

But some pediatric surgery is elective, Olney says. In light of these findings, I would recommend that if surgery really does not have to be performed early in life, it would be prudent to postpone it.

The investigators also suggest that some surgical procedures might not require general anesthesia, or in some cases the duration of general anesthesia could be reduced. They also say that the common practice of keeping newborns continuously sedated in pediatric intensive care units should carefully be evaluated in order to minimize potential damage from the sedating drugs.

Enhance your child’s brain development – Interview with Dr. Perlmutter

June 15th, 2007

Every parent wants to raise a smart child. But did you know that there are simple things you do and dont do in your childs first five years of life that can raise your childs IQ by up to 30 points and actually prevent ADD and ADHD? Caroline and Jacquie talk with renowned neurologist David Perlmutter, author of Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten, about brain development research and information every parent should know. Click Here to listen to interview

Solvents linked to diminished IQ

April 20th, 2007

From

Mercury Exposure.org

Children of women exposed to common organic solvents during pregnancy have significantly lower scores on a wide range of cognitive, motor and behavioral tests, according to a new study.

The average IQ of the exposed group was eight points lower than a group of comparable unexposed children — a gap one expert described as “huge.”

The study, which appeared in this month’s issue of The Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, focused solely on solvent exposure at work.

“This has tremendous implications for the female work force,” said University of Toronto psychologist Maru Barrera, one of the authors.

The researchers recommend that pregnant women limit exposure to the chemicals, widely used in many industries, including manufacturing plants, hair and nail salons and medical laboratories. “Women who are pregnant should not be exposed to organic solvents during the duration of their pregnancy,” Barrera said.

Organic solvents are a huge group of disparate chemicals. Toluene, for example, is an ingredient in polyurethane, as well as in paints, glues and gasoline. Hexane is used in pesticides, wood stains and printing.

The compounds also are found in a variety of home products, but the researchers said exposure at home is likely to be sporadic and much more limited than at work.

“The study is very interesting and potentially important,” said Herbert Needleman, a University of Pittsburgh pediatrician and psychiatrist who has shown that prenatal and childhood lead exposure can permanently damage the brain.

Needleman said that the IQ decrease was potentially significant. For most children, the loss of eight IQ points might not make an obvious difference. But in previous studies on the effects of lead, Needleman found that a four-point drop in average IQ creates a fourfold rise in the number of children with severe mental deficits.

“If you move that curve eight points down, you greatly increase the number” of such children, he said.

Researchers examined the children of 32 women who were exposed to organic solvents during pregnancy. They included factory workers, lab technicians, embalmers and a science teacher. They worked with solvents that included hexane, trichloroethylene, acetone, toluene and phenol.

The scientists compared their children to 32 offspring of unexposed mothers. Both groups, ages 3 to 9 years old, took a range of cognitive and motor tests. Parents also answered a questionnaire about their children’s behavior.

The exposed children had lower scores in almost all the tests. Although not enormous, the differences were significant, researchers said. The largest gap was in verbal ability, but the exposed children also performed worse on tests of memory, dexterity, visual acuity and color perception. Youngsters in the solvent group also displayed greater hyperactivity and had more trouble paying attention. But Gideon Koren, a University of Toronto pediatrician and co-author, said the data did not show a link to attention deficit disorder.

In an e-mail response to questions about the study, a spokesman for the American Chemistry Council, the industry’s trade group, wrote: “Protecting the health and well-being of children is a fundamental value the chemical industry shares with society. The (study’s) authors themselves acknowledge that this study is not a ‘refined risk assessment’ and conclude that ‘further evaluation’ is necessary.”

Several experts expressed similar caution. “We need a larger study to confirm these findings,” said Tina Lawson, an epidemiologist at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Lawson is working on a national study of 9,000 women and children to examine the relationship between birth defects and a wide range of chemicals, including solvents.

Researchers have long known that high doses of some solvents can cause cancer and neurological ills in adults. Animal studies have shown that solvents can cause birth defects, but there is little research involving human fetuses and children.

In recent years, scientists have realized that children are often much more vulnerable to the effects of chemicals than adults. But most workplace regulations set chemical safety standards by hazard to adults.

Koren said the finding showed that, as a class, solvents are more hazardous than previously understood: “Safety levels for adults are not necessarily safety levels for the developing brain.”

While no one knows exactly how many women are exposed to organic solvents at work, Koren estimates that the number is in the millions. Because the study subjects worked with a variety of solvents, and exposures weren’t measured, researchers said there’s no way to know whether some solvents are more hazardous than others.

The chemicals bind to oils, so they’re used for cleaning everything from industrial machinery to clothing. All organic solvents are volatile, which means molecules constantly escape into the air.

The volatility allows the chemicals to infiltrate the body with relative ease, primarily through the mouth and lungs, as well as by contact with the skin.

Solvents also are ingredients in many household products, including cleaners, polishers and deodorizers. But Koren said he was less worried about the risks of home use because such exposures do not typically occur repeatedly over days or months.

Some scientists said the study underscored the particular vulnerability of fetuses and children. Solvents might be the latest widely disseminated chemicals — a list that includes lead and mercury, among others — that turn out to be especially dangerous during development.

Said Needleman: “We don’t know how smart our children could be if we didn’t poison them.”

Dr. Perlmutter’s comment: I love that last quote. Rachel Carson RachelCarson.org was so right. Chapter 9 of

Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten is entitled: Avoiding Toxins That May Deplete Your Child’s Brain Power.