Power Up Your Brain
Power Up Your Brain
by David Perlmutter, MD, FACN, ABIHM &
Albert Villoldo, Ph.D
Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten
Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten
by David Perlmutter, MD, FACN, ABIHM
The Better Brain Book


by David Perlmutter, MD, FACN, ABIHM
Read Dr. Perlmutter's
articles at

Tea consumers may have younger biological age

August 30th, 2009

From NutraIngredients-USA.com:

The cells of regular tea drinkers may have a younger biological age than cells from non-drinkers, according to new research from China.

Researchers from the Chinese University of Hong Kong looked at the length of telomeres, DNA sequences at the end of chromosomes that shorten as cells replicate and age.

The ageing and lifespan of normal, healthy cells are linked to the so-called telomerase shortening mechanism, which limits cells to a fixed number of divisions. During cell replication, the telomeres function by ensuring the cell’s chromosomes do not fuse with each other or rearrange, which can lead to cancer. Elizabeth Blackburn, a telomere pioneer at the University of California San Francisco, likened telomeres to the ends of shoelaces, without which the lace would unravel.

With each replication the telomeres shorten, and when the telomeres are totally consumed, the cells are destroyed (apoptosis). Previous studies have also reported that telomeres are highly susceptible to oxidative stress. Some experts have noted that telomere length may be a marker of biological ageing.

“The antioxidative properties of tea and its constituent nutrients may protect telomeres from oxidative damage in the normal ageing process,” wrote the authors in the British Journal of Nutrition.

The Hong Kong-based researchers, led by Ruth Chan, noted that the telomeres of people who drank an average of three cups of tea per day were about 4.6 kilobases longer than people who drank an average of a quarter of a cup a day.

This average difference in the telomere length corresponds to “approximately a difference of 5 years of life”, wrote the researchers, led by Ruth Chan.

Dr Chan told NutraIngredients that “Chinese tea” in their study refers to both black and green tea, but added: “Our data showed that majority of Chinese tea consumed by our subjects were of green tea”.

Tea break

Green tea contains between 30 and 40 per cent of water-extractable polyphenols, while black tea (green tea that has been oxidized by fermentation) contains between 3 and 10 per cent.

The four primary polyphenols found in fresh tealeaves are epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate, and epicatechin.

Study details

The study’s findings are based on the telomere lengths of 976 Chinese men and 1,030 Chinese women aged over 65. The participants’ dietary habits were evaluated using a food frequency questionnaire.

Overall, only tea consumption was associated with telomere length. The highest intakes, three cups or 750 millilitres per day, was associated with significantly longer telomere lengths, compared to people who drank 70 millilitres per day or less, said the researchers.

Multivitamins, too?

Recently, researchers from the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences reported that telomere length was longer in regular multivitamin users in their cohort of 586 women aged between 35 and 74.

Writing in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, the US-based researchers noted that theirs was the “first epidemiologic study of multivitamin use and telomere length.

“Regular multivitamin users tend to follow a healthy lifestyle and have a higher intake of micronutrients, which sometimes makes it difficult to interpret epidemiologic observations on multivitamin use,” they said.

Source: British Journal of Nutrition

Aging well starts in womb, as mom’s choices affect whole life

July 3rd, 2009

From USAToday.com:

Keishawn Williams is already talking to her baby, although her child isn’t due until November.
“What are you doing?” asks Williams, 22. “Are you awake? Are you asleep? Why are you sitting on my bladder?”

Although Williams may not realize it, her body and baby are also conducting a separate, even more important conversation that may influence her child’s health for the rest of its life. Although neither mother nor child is aware of this crucial dialogue, Williams’ body already is telling her baby about what to expect from the world outside, says Mark Hanson, a professor at the University of Southampton in England.

And thanks to those biological signals, the choices that Williams makes today — by getting good prenatal care, eating nutrient-packed vegetables and avoiding alcohol, tobacco and caffeine — may help her baby long after birth, Hanson says. Research into the “developmental origins of adult disease” suggests that Williams’ healthy living may help her child avoid problems such as cancer, heart disease, depression and diabetes not just in childhood, but 50 years from now.

WEIGHT: How to feed your baby right, even before birth
BABY NAMES: What’s hot? Whatever’s unusual
COLIC: May be linked to dads’ depression
Though adults still need to eat right and exercise, a growing number of studies now suggest the best time to fight the diseases of aging may be before babies are even born, says Peter Gluckman of the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

Williams’ baby is still too young to kick, let alone ponder its future. But its body is already adapting and preparing for its specific environment, Gluckman says, by reading cues sent through Williams’ blood and amniotic fluid.

“Every baby in fetal life is adjusting its pattern of development according to the world it predicts it will live in,” he says.

Reading cues while in utero

During the crucial “window of opportunity” before birth and during infancy, environmental cues help “program” a person’s DNA, says Alexander Jones of Great Ormond Street Hospital in London and the University College of London Institute for Child Health. This happens through a delicate interplay of genes and the environment called epigenetics, which can determine how a baby reacts for the rest of its life, Jones says.

Through epigenetics, chemical groups attach to DNA. Although they don’t change the order of the genes, the chemical groups can switch those genes on or off, Jones says.

Many things, such as chemical contaminants, can cause epigenetic changes. So babies exposed in the womb to synthetic hormones may begin responding abnormally to the natural hormones later made by their own bodies, says Hugh Taylor of Yale University School of Medicine.

That’s why, doctors believe, many babies exposed before birth to a drug called DES, or diethylstilbestrol, later developed rare cancers or fertility problems, Taylor says.

Doctors stopped prescribing DES, which had been used for decades to prevent miscarriages, in 1971. But Taylor and other scientists are concerned that “hormone-disrupting” chemicals, such as those used in pesticides and even common plastics, could cause similar problems.

Babies and children also can develop abnormal reactions to stress, says Jack Shonkoff of Harvard University, co-author of a June paper on early influences in health in The Journal of the American Medical Association.

In the short term, reacting to typical, everyday difficulties can help people develop a healthy response to stress.

But persistent, “toxic” stress — such as neglect or extreme poverty — may program a child’s nervous system to be on perpetual high alert. Over time, this can damage the immune response and lead to chronic ailments, such as heart disease and depression, the study says.

Diet as a predictor

A pregnant woman’s diet tells a fetus a lot about its future environment, including how much food will be available after birth, Jones says.

A baby conceived during a famine, for example, might learn to be “thrifty,” hoarding every calorie and packing on fat rather than muscle, even at the expense of developing vital organs, such as the kidneys, liver and brain. Because of a lack of calories, the baby also may be born small.

In a famine, those early adjustments and predictions about the future could mean the difference between survival and starvation, Jones says.

But babies may run into trouble if the world doesn’t match their predictions, Jones says.

A baby who has learned to hoard calories, for example, may grow up to be fat or diabetic once he or she finally gets enough to eat, Jones says. Doctors believe this occurs not just with babies whose mothers are starving, but with those who are malnourished because of a mother’s medical problems, poor nutrition or exposure to tobacco smoke, which damages the placenta.

It’s well known, Taylor says, that women who smoke are more likely to have low-birth-weight babies, who are in some ways “starved” for nutrients in the womb. Babies born too small are at risk for many immediate problems, such as underdeveloped lungs and bleeding in the brain.

If they survive, these youngsters also face long-term risks.

Studies show that small babies who gain weight rapidly in infancy or childhood — a sign that bodies are already making the most of every calorie — also have higher rates of adult heart disease and diabetes, Jones says.

Specialized X-rays have shown babies of young mothers with poor diets in India, for example, are born with extra belly fat, even though they seem to be a normal weight. Once these babies start getting an adequate diet, they are likely to put on weight, Gluckman says.

“Even by the time of birth, they’re on a different pattern of development,” Gluckman says.

Teaching future mothers

Adversity in early life can increase a child’s risk of disease, but it doesn’t seal his or her fate, Shonkoff says.

Although emotional abuse in childhood increases the risk of adult depression, for example, supportive relationships with adults can help children cope and recover, Shonkoff says.

Communities also can help, Gluckman says. By helping women such as Williams get good prenatal care and nutrition, for example, communities can reduce the number of fetuses who are malnourished and born small, Gluckman says. Babies who are born at normal weight are more likely to maintain that healthy weight.

Because half of pregnancies are unplanned, women need to learn about nutrition — and maintain healthy diets — long before they conceive, Gluckman says.

“We have got to give far greater focus to mothers, the women who are likely to become mothers and to the care of newborn children than we have in the past,” Gluckman says.

Williams, who also has a 1-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter, says she’s trying hard to give her children a bright future. She breast-fed both and now works as a breast-feeding peer counselor at the Family Health and Birth Center in Washington, D.C., where many patients are low-income or minority mothers.

The birth center also aims to help babies by getting their moms good prenatal care.

About 6% of black mothers who delivered at the birth center had low-birth-weight babies, compared with the citywide average of 14.2% for black mothers, says the center’s Ruth Watson Lubic.

“Twentieth-century medicine dealt with child health and adult health separately,” Shonkoff says. “What 21st-century medicine is telling us is that if we want to change adult health, we have to look in babies, even before they’re born.”

How Old Are You Inside? Blood Test May Tell

June 26th, 2009

From WebMD.com:

You know how many birthday candles are on your cake, but a new blood test may be able to tell whether you’re aging faster, or slower, than you think.

That blood test is described in a new study, published in Aging Cell. It measures a protein called p16 that rises with age, and rises particularly fast if you smoke and don’t exercise.

Researcher Norman Sharpless, MD, an associate professor of medicine and genetics at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Chapel Hill, N.C., says other scientists identified the p16 gene years ago as a gene that helps prevent cancer. Later research showed that the p16 gene becomes more active as mammals age.

Sharpless and colleagues have created a blood test that measures p16 levels in certain immune system cells called T-cells.

Sharpless says it’s the first p16 test for cells that are easy to check. Other cells that contain p16 are in organs that are harder to get to, like the pancreas, he says. “You can’t really sample those things,” Sharpless tells WebMD. “The advance here is that this is a cell that’s easily attainable.”

In their new study, 170 healthy North Carolina adults took the p16 blood test and answered questions about their lifestyle. Sharpless and colleagues looked for patterns to gauge participants’ “molecular age,” based on their p16 blood levels.

Molecular Age Results
The results showed that p16 levels were most strongly linked to chronological age — the older a person was, the higher their p16 level was — long before that person would be considered old.

“Even at very young ages, when p16 is not very highly expressed, you can still see a difference with a decade. So you can tell a difference between 20 and 30 year olds, and 30 and 40 year olds,” Sharpless says. “Aging occurs well before you’re aged.”

Smoking was strongly linked to higher levels of p16.

“If you smoke, your p16 is higher at any age, and if you smoke a lot, your p16 is a lot higher,” Sharpless says. “I think it’s very likely, based on other data, that carcinogens make p16 go up.”

Exercise was linked to lower levels of p16. It’s not yet clear if exercise lowers p16 levels, or if people who exercise have low p16 levels for some other reason. Perhaps those people have diet habits that keep their p16 level low, Sharpless says.

“I really wouldn’t want to make the mistake that has been made recurrently in epidemiologic association studies that try and place some causal relationship between the two, other than just note that there’s a strong relationship that’s reproducible,” he says.

BMI ( body mass index) wasn’t related to p16 after the researchers took age into account. That finding surprised Sharpless.

“I would have thought that people who were thinner would have lower p16 for their age. That wasn’t true,” Sharpless says. “One could infer from that that body mass is not a great predictor of fitness … it just turned out to be a bad marker of molecular age for us.”
Sharpless sees several possible uses for the p16 blood test.

For instance, he says the test could be used as a way to determine which patients are eligible for certain medical treatments that have age limits. “There are some really healthy 70 year olds out there who are very fit and can have fairly aggressive therapies, and then there are some people who are two decades younger who are not so fit, who are sort of prematurely old,” Sharpless says.

He also sees the p16 test as a tool for researchers to explore whether anti-aging candidates — such as resveratrol or green tea — really delay aging.

“I jog and try and drink green tea or red wine,” Sharpless says. “But wouldn’t you like to know, if you’re doing that stuff for decades at a time, that it’s working? Wouldn’t you like some solid evidence that these sorts of wellness behaviors are really doing what you’re intending them to do?”

Sharpless worries about how the test might be used by health insurance companies or employers.

“I think we have to be careful about how you would apply such a marker,” he says. “This is an issue we’re going to have to face in the future as a society.”

Sharpless says the p16 test isn’t available yet, and other researchers are working on other aging tests that measure different things are in the works.

He also notes that he has a financial interest in the p16 blood test. The University of North Carolina holds a related patent and G-Zero Therapeutics, a company Sharpless co-founded, is developing the test.

Vitamin D ‘key to healthy brain’

May 22nd, 2009

From BBCNews.com:
Scientists have produced more evidence that vitamin D has an important role in keeping the brain in good working order in later life.

A study of over 3,000 European men aged 40-79 found those with high vitamin D levels performed better on memory and information processing tests.

The University of Manchester team believe vitamin D may protect cells or key signalling pathways in the brain.

The study features in the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry.

“ This underscores the importance of vitamin D for humans and why evolution gave us a liking for the sun ”
Professor Tim Spector Kings College London
It follows research published in January which suggested that high levels of vitamin D can help stave off the mental decline that can affect people in old age.

The latest study focused on men from eight cities across Europe.

Their mental agility was assessed using a range of tests, and samples were taken to measure levels of vitamin D in their blood.

Men with high vitamin D levels performed best, with those who had the lowest levels – 35 nmol/litre or under – registering poor scores.

The researchers said the reason why vitamin D – found in fish and produced by sun exposure – seemed to aid mental performance was unclear.

Hormone link

They suggested it might trigger an increase in protective hormonal activity in the brain. However, the only data to back this up so far comes from animal studies.

There is also some evidence that vitamin D can dampen down an over-active immune system.

Alternatively, it may boost levels of antioxidants that in effect detoxify the brain.

The researchers stressed that many people, particularly in older age, were vitamin D deficient.

Therefore, if it were possible to stave off the effects on ageing on the brain with vitamin D supplements the implications for the health of the population could be significant.

Professor Tim Spector, of King’s College London, has carried out research into the effect of vitamin D on ageing.

He said: “This is further evidence from observational studies that vitamin D is likely to be beneficial to reduce many age-related diseases.

“Taken together with similar data that shows its importance in reducing arthritis, osteoporotic fractures, as well as heart disease and some cancers, this underscores the importance of vitamin D for humans and why evolution gave us a liking for the sun.

“We also know that our genes also determine our vitamin D levels which explains why individuals can vary so much.

“We now need to study the best way to give using vitamin D properly in prevention.”

Dr Iain Lang, of the Peninsula Medical School in Exeter, carried out the earlier research.

He agreed there was mounting evidence suggesting vitamin D was good for the brain, but warned that it was possible that poor mental performance could be down to an inadequate diet, of which vitamin D deficiency might be just one manifestation.

Experts Warn Against Long-Term Use of Common Pain Pills

May 8th, 2009

From NYTimes.com:
Aspirin and ibuprofen are staples in just about every medicine chest and first aid kit. They’re sold over the counter, and they’re not expensive. Most people don’t think twice about taking them.

But they should — especially if they’re elderly.

Last week, an expert panel of American Geriatrics Society pretty much bumped all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs, off the list of medicines recommended for adults ages 75 and older with chronic, persistent pain. Long-term use of drugs like ibuprofen, naproxen and high-dose aspirin is so dangerous, the panelists said, that elderly people who can’t get relief from alternatives like acetaminophen may be better off taking opiates, like codeine or even morphine.

All this despite the fact that NSAIDs are known to be effective for chronic pain conditions that often plague older adults — and despite the fact that opiates can be addictive.

“We’ve come out a little strong at this point in time about the risks of NSAIDs in older people,” said Dr. Bruce Ferrell, chair of the panel that made the recommendations and a professor of geriatrics at the University of California, Los Angeles. “We hate to throw the baby out with the bathwater — they do work for some people — but it is fairly high risk when these drugs are given in moderate to high doses, especially if given over time.”

“It looks like patients would be safer on these opioids than on high doses of NSAIDs for long periods of time,” he said, adding that for most elderly, the risk of addiction appears to be low. “You don’t see people in this age group stealing a car to get their next dose.”

The risks from chronic use of NSAIDs are myriad. They can cause life-threatening ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding, a side effect that occurs more frequently and with greater severity as people age. Some NSAIDs may increase the risk for heart attacks or strokes, and they don’t interact well with drugs used to treat heart failure. They can make high blood pressure worse, even uncontrollable, and impair kidney function. And the list of potentially hazardous interactions with other drugs is a long one, experts say.

“Physiological changes in the elderly affect the way drugs are absorbed and secreted and how the body responds to them,” said Dr. Keela Herr, a professor at the University of Iowa College of Nursing in Iowa City who researches pain management in the elderly and was involved in drafting the new guidelines. “Younger people can use this class of medicine with limited risks. In older persons, it’s a different story. Physical changes make them more sensitive.”

The geriatrics society’s new guidelines say NSAIDs should be considered “rarely” in the population of frail elderly people, and used “with extreme caution” and then only in “highly selected individuals.” For those patients with moderate to severe pain that diminishes the quality of life, opiates may be considered, the guidelines suggest, after both the patient and caregiver are screened for prior substance abuse.

It is the third revision of the guidelines, originally created in 1998 and updated in 2002. In this latest version, acetaminophen remains the top choice for chronic pain. But acetaminophen is a fairly weak analgesic, experts say.

“Opioids are, everyone agrees, probably the strongest pain medication you have,” said Dr. Roger Chou, a pain expert who was not involved in writing the new guidelines and believes decisions about opioid therapy must be made on a case-by-case basis. “The down side is the potential for abuse, and we’re seeing huge increases nationwide of reports about the misuse and diversion of prescription drugs and related deaths. . . .The concerns about opioids are very real.”

He argued that opioids must be prescribed very carefully, no matter what the age of the patient. Patients with chronic persistent pain will be on the drugs for a long time, because the pain usually does not go away, and they will also be at risk of developing other problems related to the medication, such as constipation, nausea and fatigue.

The guidelines are not meant to discourage the treatment of pain. On the contrary, chronic pain is rampant among the elderly, affecting an estimated 25 to 50 percent of elderly people living in the community and up to 85 percent of nursing home residents. Often caused by degenerative spine conditions, arthritis and cancer or cancer treatment, chronic pain takes a powerful toll on quality of life.

Untreated, chronic pain can disrupt sleep and affect mood, restrict mobility and lead to depression, anxiety and isolation, experts say. It can also contribute to falls, which lead to further complications and often death. Although non-drug treatments like physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy and other educational interventions are often helpful, adding drugs to the mix usually enhances treatment, experts say.

“There really continues to be a significant amount of unrecognized and untreated pain in older people, and it’s a huge problem,” Dr. Herr said. “A lot of people think that just because they’re getting older they’re going to have pain and just have to learn to live with it. That’s not the case.”

Pain cannot always be entirely eliminated, she added. “You can get to the point where it’s in the mild category — where it’s annoying but not causing such impairment that you can’t function and interact and do the things that are important.”